‘Poor Things’ Review: Emma Stone and Yorgos Lanthimos Fly Their Freak Flags in a Delicious Coming-of-Age Story Like No Other (2024)

It’s a failing of our society that we’ve allowed “interesting” to become a euphemism, a blandly veiled insult, something to say when no other praise comes to mind. Little in life is more important than interest: having it, attracting it, identifying it in any crevice of the everyday, making it strange and fresh in the process. Across his career, Yorgos Lanthimos has befuddled many a viewer into calling his work “interesting” as a placeholder for their confusion and excitement, and it’s hard to imagine that he’d ever take offense. He’s a filmmaker who revels in interest, in curiosity at the price of comfort, and in his lavish, violently ravishing new film “Poor Things,” he zeroes in on a heroine with the same craving. To Bella Baxter, a literal child in a woman’s body, everything is new and everything is interesting — words, bodies, maps, music, sugar, sex — and Lanthimos matches her fascination with rampant glee.

Alasdair Gray’s 1992 comic novel “Poor Things” is a work of peculiar, obsessive genius, a book-within-a-book-within-a-book that satirizes Victorian Britain’s seemingly conflicting preoccupations with decorum and grotesquerie, all while teasing the modern reader’s own tabloid-trained taste for the lurid. In an adaptation at once liberal and faithful to the novel’s fastidious construction, unhinged humor and revolting body horror, Lanthimos and screenwriter Tony McNamara (whose lascivious wit was so integral to the success of their previous collaboration “The Favourite”) have shed its ornate literary affectations — and, in a move that may infuriate some Gray loyalists, its specific Scottish burr — without simplifying the plunging philosophical questions contained within its jokery. What makes a life, or indeed a human? Who gets to give life and take it away? Is adult behavior just learned repression? And how do they make the pastry so crisp?

At its heart, this is a Frankenstein tale, with the spindly, beautiful Bella (Emma Stone) its unlikely monster. Her doctor/creator is Godwin (Willem Dafoe), a gnarled, facially scarred recluse and surgical genius whom she aptly and affectionately calls God. How Bella came to be is a secret best discovered in the course of the film’s snaking, globe-circling narrative, though a vertical scar at the base of her neck, hidden beneath a waist-length sheet of sable hair, offers a clue. To begin with, only three people know she exists at all: Godwin, his housekeeper Mrs Prim (Vicki Pepperdine) and Max McCandless (Ramy Youssef), the inquisitive young med student whom Godwin takes on as a research assistant.

Max is immediately transfixed by Bella, a fully grown woman who speaks, moves and reasons like a toddler, hammering away at the drawing-room piano and throwing her breakfast in his face, cackling all the while. He assumes she has a rare mental disability, but Godwin insists she’s merely growing. Sure enough, she is, even as her physical person remains unchanged — save for her increasingly deranged dress sense. Her vocabulary expands by 15 words a day. Her thinking clarifies and sharpens. One crucial day she discovers what’s between her legs, and how good it feels when she touches it. When she’s told she can’t discuss, much less perform, such things in public, she’s baffled anyone would pretend such readily available pleasure doesn’t exist.

For the meekly besotted Max, it is unfortunate that Bella then encounters Duncan Wedderburn (a riotous Mark Ruffalo, niftily mustachioed), a rakish, hedonistic lawyer who tells her that “polite society destroys the soul,” before promising to sweep her away, take her traveling and give her all the sex she wants. Given that she’s hitherto been strictly confined to Godwin’s rambling, curio-filled London townhouse, cultivating a keen interest in the outside world via atlases and her guardians’ unreliable tutelage, it’s an irresistible offer. Wedderburn’s puffed-up charms may pall within days, but the sights and sounds of Lisbon, the first stop on their tour, do not. Cue a strange, sad, twisty, horny, often uproariously funny coming-of-age arc, through which a rapidly more worldly Bella learns how much there is to being a woman, how little there is to certain men, and eventually gets a complicated answer to the question she asks after she and Wedderburn first rattle the bedposts: “Why don’t people do this all the time?”

It’s a vast absurdist odyssey, positively compact at a galloping 141 minutes, that takes in a groaning buffet of settings and ripe secondary characters — all played with relish by a dream ensemble that runs the gamut from Jerrod Carmichael to Kathryn Hunter to Hanna Schygulla — but rests on a single astonishing performance by Stone. Having ceded the plum part to Olivia Colman in “The Favourite” while perfecting her cut-glass English accent, she’s rewarded here for her patience with what most actors would have to honestly call a never-in-a-lifetime role. Molding Bella before our eyes from infancy to adolescence to adulthood — her speech, bearing and body language all intricately evolving from one scene to the next — she tackles grand-scale physical comedy (including a hall-of-fame-level dance sequence between her and Ruffalo) with gusto, all while marking the character’s growing, sinking sense of reality with a steadily hardening gaze.

Any less brave or brazen a performance would likely sink amid the veritable firework display of formal technique and trickery with which Lanthimos illustrates his heroine’s dizzily expanding, distorted acquaintance with the world — a busy, swirling mise-en-scène that fuses chintzy matte-painting artifice with eye-popping digital effects to conjure the disorienting awe of childish discovery from a cosmopolitan adult vantage point. Flushing from harsh monochrome to hyper-saturated Kodak color once Bella leaves home — entering not Oz, but a seductive realm of marshmallow skies, gleaming vinyl oceans and pasteis de nata — ace DP Robbie Ryan frequently returns to the queasy wide-angle lenses that were such a feature of “The Favourite,” all the better to connote a perspective still overwhelmed by the choice of where to look.

The film’s playfully elastic sense of period — a marked change from the novel, with its neurotically recorded dates and particulars — is amplified by the startling work of production designers Shona Heath and James Price, whose visual reference points flit from Arts and Crafts to Art Deco, Victorian steampunk to Belle Epoque luxury, all strewn across sets that delight in the overt fakery and garbled exotica of golden-age Hollywood world-building. Cities like Lisbon, Paris and Alexandria become top-heavy soundstage parodies of themselves, as a child might dream them after leafing through a picture book. Holly Waddington’s exquisite costumes are likewise untethered to reality: Heavy on sky-high shoulder pads and outsize whipped-cream collars in aggressively clashing hues, her creations for Bella mark both her otherness from everyone else and her developing self-awareness.

Against this spirit of sensual and sensory richness, experimental pop artist Jerskin Fendrix’s gnawing, atonal score — mirroring Bella’s switching fixations by doggedly stressing one instrument at a time — stands out for its severity. Consider it an aural reminder that Lanthimos, even when granted both the finances and freedom to realize such an extravagant adult fantasy, remains something of a brutalist, a surgeon who will rudely cut to the heart of the human condition, spilling insides that not everyone will want to see. Oddly moving in its fervor and abundance, “Poor Things” may appear a far cry from the harsh, stripped ascetism of an early work like “Dogtooth.” But they’re actually similar animals, fixated on taking people apart to find what makes them tick, what makes them swoon, what makes them interesting.

‘Poor Things’ Review: Emma Stone and Yorgos Lanthimos Fly Their Freak Flags in a Delicious Coming-of-Age Story Like No Other (2024)

FAQs

‘Poor Things’ Review: Emma Stone and Yorgos Lanthimos Fly Their Freak Flags in a Delicious Coming-of-Age Story Like No Other? ›

It's a vast absurdist odyssey, positively compact at a galloping 141 minutes, that takes in a groaning buffet of settings and ripe secondary characters — all played with relish by a dream ensemble that runs the gamut from Jerrod Carmichael to Kathryn Hunter to Hanna Schygulla — but rests on a single astonishing ...

What is the message behind the Poor Things? ›

Poor Things is a film about innocence, about discovery, about human nature. It makes us question the way we view things, the way we censor behaviour, the way we impose societal norms upon each other, and how seeing those norms disregarded can be both disturbing and exhilarating.

What is the point of Poor Things summary? ›

It's basically about a woman realizing she doesn't need men in an age where women are more so or less viewed as property. She also finds an independent voice in an age where women aren't encouraged to speak or have thoughts.

What are critics saying about Poor Things? ›

Wildly imaginative and exhilaratingly over the top, Poor Things is a bizarre, brilliant tour de force for director Yorgos Lanthimos and star Emma Stone. Poor Things is a weird, wild good time and Emma Stone is fantastic in it -- just be prepared for adult themes that may unsettle or offend some viewers.

How disturbing are Poor Things? ›

Content warning: the film depicts scenes of blood, interior organs, dead corpses, graphic surgery, suicide, sexual assault, prostitution and nudity. The film “Poor Things” got some of the most mixed reviews that I have ever seen, making it arguably one of the most impactful films of the year.

Is Poor Things worth reading? ›

Satirizing the classic Victorian novel, Poor Things is a hilarious political allegory and a thought-provoking duel between the desires of men and the independence of women, from one of Scotland's most accomplished authors.

Why are Poor Things controversial? ›

The film's themes have led to backlash, with some claiming that the fact it has a male director, and therefore a male gaze, makes it sexist. There have also been accusations that the nudity is exploitative and that, because Bella has the brain of a child, there are consent issues at play.

How many Oscars did "Poor Things" win? ›

It was a triumphant evening for Element Pictures, Fremantle, RTL Group, and all of Bertelsmann. The Irish production company's feature film “Poor Things” scooped four Oscars at last night's glamorous Academy Awards ceremony in Hollywood, the most important night in international film.

What happened to Godwin's face in Poor Things? ›

"They told me he was a physician and a teacher, and also that he was deformed" — his face and body are heavily scarred by a lifetime of experiments inflicted upon him — "so right off the bat, he seemed to share one aspect with the monster in Frankenstein and another with Dr. Frankenstein himself."

Is "Poor Things" based on a true story? ›

PSA: Poor Things is not a true story | Dazed.

What accent do they have in Poor Things? ›

Novel and film Bella Baxter both have English accents. I don't think it would have been a stretch for the other originally Glaswegian characters to have remained Scottish. Indeed, Ruffalo and Ramy Youssef's upper-class English accents slip back to American a few times across what are otherwise brilliant performances.

What is the ending of "poor things"? ›

Emma Stone's Oscar-nominated movie is now available on Disney+. At the ending of Poor Things, a character sees his brain surgically replaced by a goat's brain. It's a happy ending, and not even the weirdest part of the movie.

What is Bella's personality in Poor Things? ›

Bella Baxter is impulsive, impolite, chaotic, curious, violent, lovable, awed, disillusioned, monstrous, and naïve — and in any combination, at any time. She begins the movie babbling nonsense, throwing temper tantrums, and gleefully wetting herself.

Why do people love Poor Things? ›

Some admirers of Poor Things have argued that it's a feminist work, in which Bella's erotic awakening becomes the key to her liberation. The movie's detractors have dismissed it as just a superficially empowering girlboss narrative.

Why are Poor Things so weird? ›

Poor Things can get a little freaky at times thanks to the camera work and the strange, fleshy creatures which populate the film's steampunk Europe. You can't be faulted for fearing for Bella. But the film isn't a story of sexual exploitation or abuse.

Is Poor Things immoral? ›

Thus, scene for scene, POOR THINGS stands as one of the most obscene major motion pictures released by Hollywood that MOVIEGUIDE® has covered. POOR THINGS is also one of the most abhorrent, disgusting, immoral, inane movies ever made.

What is the meaning of "poor thing"? ›

used to show that you are sad for someone: That cold sounds terrible, you poor thing!

What is the meaning of the Apple scene in Poor Things? ›

The scene highlights societal restrictions and expectations around sex, showcasing Bella's struggle with conforming to polite society.

What does the ending of "poor things" mean? ›

Bella ends up living happily at Godwin's estate and swapping Alfie's brain with a goat. Bella's choice to leave Max at the altar for Alfie hints at her curiosity and desire for truth. Duncan reunites Bella and Alfie out of spite and control, but she eventually breaks free.

What does the title "poor things" mean? ›

“'Poor Things' is the title and that's what it's about. In the way we try to control each other and our ideas, and people's bodies and people's views.”

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Patricia Veum II

Last Updated:

Views: 5973

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (44 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Patricia Veum II

Birthday: 1994-12-16

Address: 2064 Little Summit, Goldieton, MS 97651-0862

Phone: +6873952696715

Job: Principal Officer

Hobby: Rafting, Cabaret, Candle making, Jigsaw puzzles, Inline skating, Magic, Graffiti

Introduction: My name is Patricia Veum II, I am a vast, combative, smiling, famous, inexpensive, zealous, sparkling person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.